The RTX 3060 Ti is massively popular, but what can take it on?
WePC is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Prices subject to change. Learn more
The RTX 3060 Ti is perhaps the very best GPU right now for those looking for fantastic value for money. Capable of buttery smooth 1080p gameplay and capable enough to step up to 1440p, especially in older titles. Despite all that, it may still be worth checking out a similar alternative or two – and we’ve got just what you need.
Continue reading below as we take you through all the relevant details. A GPU which is equivalent to the RTX 3060 Ti and is just as competitive on price should be gaining a lot of attention right now.
The Radeon RX 6600 XT, one of the newest graphics cards from AMD for 1080p gaming, has been released. But how does it stands up against the Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti, which is currently the top GPU for 1080p? If you’re building a new PC, it’s always important to compare!
Stylish, gaming aesthetics
Strong materials and build design
High-end cooling solution
On the expensive side
Compact design
Great performance enhancements available
Limited cooling capacity
Potentially loud design
To assist you in determining which graphics card is more valuable, we have pitted the two against one another. Continue reading to learn how they compare in terms of cost, specifications, features, and performance.
At $379 (about £273), the AMD RX 6600 XT is the more inexpensive choice. The Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti costs £369/$399, which is $20 more expensive in the US.
The Nvidia 3060 Ti is based on the Ampere Ampere architecture, which has increased ray tracing cores and tensor cores, whereas the AMD RX 6600 XT is based on AMD’s RDNA 2 architecture, which enables features like AMD Infinity Cache and ray tracing.
The clock speed and boost clock speed of the 6600 XT are both 2359 MHz, which is much faster than the 3060 Ti’s base clock speed and boost clock speed of 1410 MHz and 1670 MHz, respectively. But assuming it indicates AMD’s GPU is more potent would be incorrect.
Core Clock Speed
1890MHz Boost Clock (OC)
Cuda Cores
4,864
Memory
8GB GDDR6
Dimensions
318 mm x 140 mm x 57 mm
PSU required
750W
TBP
Axial-tech Triple Fan
Core Clock Speed
2607MHz Boost, 2064MHz Base
Stream Processors
2048
Memory Size
8GB GDDR6
Dimensions
243mm x 134mm x 52 mm (2.6 slot)
PSU Required
500W
When combined with a Ryzen 5000 processor, the RX 6600 XT has support for AMD Smart Access Memory, which can boost performance in some games by up to 11%.
Additionally, Radeon Anti-Lag and Radeon Boost, which boost performance in fast-moving game situations, are included with the 6600 XT.
The best feature offered by Nvidia is DLSS, which employs artificial intelligence to increase a game’s frame rate performance and make up for performance reductions brought on by things like ray tracing.
The FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution) spatial upscaling solutions from AMD, which also increase framerates for high-resolution games, were just released. It is apparently less successful than DLSS since there is a significant sacrifice in the image quality.
We have to mention AMD’s RX 6650 XT too – a more recent, updated model which aims to provide just a little bit extra power than the 6600 XT.
Core Clock Speed
2,055 MHz base, 2,689 MHz boost, 2689 MHz game
Stream Processors
2,048
Memory Size
8GB GDDR6
Dimensions
243 x 134 x 49 mm
PSU Required
650W
If looking for an alternative choice, the RX 6600 XT is the closest GPU equivalent to the RTX 3060 Ti. This is AMD’s closest competitor and is a great alternative to choose from. Especially with Radeon’s ability to improve performance from RSR and other software features. For an extra kick, you can also look to the RX 6650 XT, the refresh offering a boost to what you can achieve from it.
Trusted Source
WePC’s mission is to be the most trusted site in tech. Our editorial content is 100% independent and we put every product we review through a rigorous testing process before telling you exactly what we think. We won’t recommend anything we wouldn’t use ourselves. Read more
